Elections Have Consequences
In the midst of the tax reform debate taking place on
Capitol Hill, many who live in high-tax states such as New
York , Illinois , New
Jersey and California
do not like one of the proposals that would eliminate the state and local tax
deductions. Those states, along with Connecticut , Maryland
and Massachusetts ,
receive more than 50 percent of the value of the deduction on federal income
tax returns for state and local taxes; according to the Daily Signal. Eleven
of thirty-five Republicans who represent these high-tax states in the House
of Representatives voted against the Budget Resolution designed to clear the
way for tax reform, citing their concerns over the abolition of state and local
tax deductions as part of the tax reform package. The resolution still managed to pass the
House in spite of their objections. Those
in favor of abolishing the state and local tax deductions argue that the
deductions encourage state and local governments to tax at higher levels. When people in high-tax states itemize their
deductions, individuals in lower-tax states have to pick up the tab. It looks like leaders on Capitol Hill have
agreed to a compromise where the GOP’s tax reform proposal will keep
property tax deductions but eliminate the state and local tax
deductions.
To reiterate a phrase made popular by President Obama,
“Elections have consequences.” People in
high-tax states continue to elect Democratic legislatures over Republican
legislatures who would likely cut taxes if they ever had a chance to win in
those deep-blue states. Many people who
grew tired of paying such high taxes have decided to flee to lower-tax states
such as Florida and Texas .
These states continue to gain representation in Congress as a result of
rapid population growth while states like Illinois
and New York
continue to lose seats in the House of Representatives. You would think the governments of those
states would have gotten the message by now.
Due to their obsession with the President’s tweets, the
media has had little time to discuss a case before the Supreme Court: Gill
v. Whitford. The plaintiff in
the case argues that the Wisconsin legislature
unfairly drew the state legislative districts to benefit Republicans. In my opinion, the Democrats make it too easy. Many of them live in closely clustered urban
areas while Republicans generally choose to spread out. The Supreme Court will issue a ruling on Gill
v. Whitford next year. The ruling
could significantly impact how Congressional and state legislative districts
are drawn in the future. The Courts have
already looked unfavorably on racial gerrymandering but have not really weighed
in on partisan gerrymandering. Florida,
Virginia
and North
Carolina had to redraw their United States Congressional Districts ahead of
last year’s elections after Courts found that their legislatures
unconstitutionally drew some of the districts using race as a factor. Democrats picked up three
House seats as a result of the new maps that they might not have picked up
otherwise; these pickups accounted for half of their net gain in the 2016 House
elections.
While the media wants people to believe that only
Republicans gerrymander, the Congressional map in Maryland tells a different story. In 2012, the Democrats redrew
Maryland ’s 6th
Congressional District; which had previously included reliably Republican
counties in the western and northern part of the state. The new district included heavily Democratic
areas in the Washington , D.C. metro area, while transferring the more
conservative areas in the northern part of the state into the already reliably
Democratic 8th District. This
partisan gerrymandering allowed Rep. John Delaney to unseat the ten-term
Republican incumbent. Delaney will
vacate his seat next year to begin a long shot bid to unseat President Trump in
2020.
If voters in high tax states want lower taxes, send a
message by voting for people who will actually cut your taxes. In New York , Republicans
already control the State Senate. But
they cannot work to lower taxes for New Yorkers as long as the Democrats
control the Governor’s Mansion and 105 of the 150 seats in the State House. I
understand that this presents an uphill battle since people on welfare rolls
who don’t pay any taxes at all repeatedly re-elect the Democrats. If Democrats want to create legislative maps more
favorable to them, winning some state legislative seats as well as some
gubernatorial races would provide them with the opportunity
to do so. They have a lot of ground to
make up since they lost over 1,000 state legislative seats during the age of
Obama and Republicans currently control two-thirds of the governorships. All states with more than one Congressional
district will have to draw new Congressional maps after the 2020 Census, which
will go into effect for the 2022 midterm elections.
While the Swamp rats do their best to make sure that
elections do not have consequences at the national level, elections at the
state and local level have yielded some very positive consequences. As Sean Hannity pointed
out on his show, Governors in Red States, with the help of their Republican
legislatures, have dramatically lowered their unemployment rates and turned
budget deficits into surpluses.
The left also tries to make sure that elections don’t
have consequences when it comes to ballot referendums. Despite the fact that more
than 30 states, including ultra-liberal California , voted in favor of State
Constitutional Amendments defining marriage as between one man and one woman,
liberals quickly went to the Courts to declare such bans unconstitutional. Let’s not forget about Proposition 187, the
immigration bill that Californians voted in favor of in 1994. The bill sought to prevent illegal immigrants
from accessing government benefits, including subsidized health care and public
education. Not surprisingly, liberals
ran to the Courts, where a Jimmy Carter-appointed judge
ruled in their favor, declaring parts of the law unconstitutional. Nearly a quarter century after nearly 60
percent of Californians voted in favor of Proposition 187, the pendulum has
swung the other way on illegal immigration.
Their neighbor to the north, Oregon ,
just enacted a bill that would force
taxpayers to subsidize illegal immigrants’ abortions. Giving Republicans control of the government
in Oregon
presents the best way to get rid of that bill, which also allows abortions
throughout all nine months of pregnancy for any reason. The Democrats currently
hold narrow
majorities in both houses of the Oregon Legislative Assembly and polling
shows a tight
race between the state’s Democratic governor and her potential Republican
opponents. Flipping nine seats across
both chambers from blue to red would give Republicans control of the Assembly. All
pro-life Oregonians should work hard to make sure that next year’s election has
consequences.
Even as liberal judicial activists, party insiders and
powerful lobbyists seek to thwart the will of the people, voting still remains
the best way for Americans to enact their desired policy preferences into law. Both parties should do their best to convince
voters that they have better ideas on how to fix the country and/or state;
rather than just relying on painting the other party as monsters. Next year’s midterm elections will have
consequences. Electing more Republicans
to the Senate should help the President enact his agenda; while giving the
Democrats control of the House will only lead to further gridlock inside the
Beltway. Mathematically speaking,
Democrats taking control of the Senate seems unlikely as does Republicans
making significant gains in the House.
Historically, the President’s party suffers electorally during midterm
elections. Republicans and conservatives
could buck that trend and turn out next year to ensure that next year’s
election does not have negative consequences for the Trump agenda.
Comments
Post a Comment