When the Pendulum Swings Too Far
Let’s start off with breaking news: Time Magazine has
announced its person of the year, or more accurately, people of the year. The honor goes to “The Silence Breakers”, a
group of women who have come forward to accuse powerful men of sexual
harassment and/or assault since the publication of The New York Times expose
detailing Hollywood movie producer Harvey
Weinstein’s bad behavior two months ago. Men in nearly every industry have lost
their jobs as a result of these allegations, from the titans of morning TV Matt
Lauer and Charlie Rose to “House of Cards” leading man Kevin Spacey. In many of these cases, the inappropriate
behavior of these men was an “open secret.” For example, Katie Couric, who
co-hosted “The Today Show” with Lauer for nine years, told
Andy Cohen in a 2012 interview on his show “Watch What Happens Live” that “He
pinches me on the a** a lot.” Politicians
on both sides of the political aisle have also had to grapple with these
allegations. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI),
previously the longest serving member of the United States House of
Representatives, announced his immediate resignation yesterday after facing a
series of sexual misconduct allegations.
While many of these accusations go back decades, the women who have
become part of the #MeToo movement that has sent shockwaves through
Post-Weinstein America say that they remained silent for so long because they
felt that speaking out would cause damage to their careers.
As the allegations of sexual misconduct continued to
pile on, many became concerned that the pendulum would swing too far. It looks like that time has finally
come. In the Michigan Attorney General’s
race, Democratic Candidate Dana Nessel aired an ad where she argued that
voters should ask themselves “Who can you trust most not to show you their
penis in a professional setting? Is it
the candidate who doesn’t have a penis?
I’d say so.” Hillary’s use of the gender card during her Presidential
campaign looks mild by comparison. As
always, I find it quite strange that liberal women running for office like to
emphasize their gender so much, particularly because the left has done
everything they can to minimize and trivialize the biological and psychological
differences that exist between men and women.
Nessel’s ad seemed to paint men with a broad brush,
suggesting that all men are sexual deviants.
Had she painted any other group with such a broad brush, she would have
faced massive pushback from the PC police.
Keep in mind that Nessel’s ad probably targeted her opponent in the
Democratic primary, not any of her potential general election opponents on the
other side of the aisle. No matter which
party ends up emerging victorious, Michigan
will have a new Attorney General after next year’s election, as Bill Schuette, Michigan ’s current
Republican Attorney General, cannot run for re-election due to term limits. Should Nessel win the election, she would
almost certainly join the long list of Democratic Attorneys General suing the
Trump Administration every step of the way.
The sexual harassment scandals and the hysteria that
has resulted from them could possibly lead to a breakdown of relations between
the two sexes in the workplace. Men may
not even want to compliment their female colleagues anymore for fear of them
taking it the wrong way and accusing them of sexual harassment. While most women who come forward to accuse
men of sexual misdeeds have done so honestly, many innocent men have seen their
reputations destroyed because of false allegations of sexual misconduct, most
notably in the Duke Lacrosse case, where Crystal Mangum, a student at Duke
University who worked as a stripper, falsely accused members of the Duke
Lacrosse team of raping her. More than a
decade later, the Ivy League school still has a stigma attached to it because
of the false accusations. Those who
falsely accuse men of sexual misconduct do a great disservice to actual victims
of sexual assault as they make the public at large more skeptical of their
stories. Feminists latch on to sexual
assault allegations, even false ones, because they reinforce the idea that we
live in a rape culture. Feminists and
Marxists want to rip apart western culture at the seams and promising to
eliminate rape culture in addition to the “patriarchy” as a whole gives them
the perfect cover. False accusations of
rape and sexual assault as well as the constant demonization of men by
feminists led to the rise of the MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) movement,
which argues that men should steer clear of romantic relationships with
women.
Since liberals love to justify bad behavior, as
evidenced by the infamous “twinkie verdict”, you would think they would want to
examine the root cause of predatory men in the workplace. Fortunately for them, I know the answer. I have a feeling the progressive gatekeepers
in Hollywood
probably will not like what I have come up with. After years and years of producing entertainment
that objectifies women, should it really come as a surprise when men in real
life start treating women the same way the men on screen treat them? It would certainly come as a welcome relief if
men started to treat women like gold again but then the feminists would start
complaining that men treat them as the weaker sex. It’s no coincidence that the rise of sexual
assault and harassment in the workplace comes at a time when religion continues
to lose influence in everyday life. When
people feel that they do not have to answer to anyone but themselves, it gives
them a sense of entitlement. Feminists
can blame toxic masculinity all they want but I think toxic secularism, which
the mainstream media and the left rarely address, does a much better job of
explaining the inexcusable behavior and cavalier attitude of sexual predators.
With groups like the ACLU and the Freedom From
Religion working so hard in recent years to banish religion from the public
square, toxic secularism may seem like a relatively new phenomenon. However, it has plagued America for roughly half a
century. The mainstreaming of toxic
secularism, as well as the objectification of women, first began during the
sexual revolution of the 1960s when the popular culture began to reject the
traditional values that Americans had adhered to for generations; especially by
abandoning the nuclear family and encouraging single parenthood. Feminists like to treat the era prior to the
1960s as the dark ages but as Ann Coulter pointed out, prior
to 1968, “Women in America were treated better than any place else on Earth, at
any time in history.” They might not
have had “Constitutional Rights” to birth control and abortion but they did not
have to worry about sexual harassment at the workplace either, as the “Manson
Family Values” that Coulter talked about in her article had yet to sweep the
nation. As powerful men have gotten away
with sexual misdeeds for the past fifty years, it should not come as a surprise
that the behavior continued well into the 21st Century; where sexual
misconduct has become more pervasive than ever before thanks to the technological
revolution that has popularized “sexting”.
While I sure hope the pendulum does not swing back to
a point where actual sexual predators continue to prey on women at the workplace,
I don’t want the pendulum to swing too far in the other direction either, to
the point where women routinely throw false accusations of sexual assault at
men as either a form of revenge or an effort to gain publicity. I know I speak for many when I say that I
hope we can find an acceptable middle ground.
Considering the polarization that has come to define our society in
recent years, that task may be easier said than done.
Comments
Post a Comment