California: A Case Study in Liberal Power Grabs
This week, California
officially became the sixth state to legalize recreational marijuana. California
voters had voted to legalize marijuana in 2016 but the law did not go into
effect until this week. Based on her romanticizing
coverage of a marijuana bus in Colorado
on New Year’s Eve, I think CNN reporter Randi Kaye must be excited.
This week, California
officially became a sanctuary state; proudly defying Federal immigration law. The geniuses in Sacramento apparently learned nothing from
the tragic death of Kate Steinle, which perfectly highlighted the consequences
of sanctuary jurisdictions. In the wake
of California ’s
newfound sanctuary state status, official-looking satirical welcome
signs appeared all over the state saying “Felons, Illegals and MS13
welcome! Democrats need the votes.” While these signs definitely triggered the
left-wing politicians who support open borders, those signs definitely
possess a higher degree of truth than many of those disingenuous politicians
would like to admit.
While Texas has
roughly the same Hispanic population as California ,
the two states have vastly different voting patterns; therefore another
variable must explain California ’s
sharp left turn: the behavior of white voters.
As Ann Coulter explained in her book Adios America: The Left’s Plan
to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole, “Hispanics in Texas are no different from Hispanics in California : Both bloc
vote for the Democrats by about 60 to 75 percent. The difference is: White Texans
overwhelmingly vote Republican, where as White Californians split their
vote. In 2012, whites were 55 percent of
the California
electorate, but they voted only 53 percent for Romney. That same year, whites were 56 percent of the
Texas
electorate—but they voted 80 percent for Romney.” By 2016, the white share of the vote had dwindled
to 48 percent in California
and whites supported Hillary over President Trump, 50 to 45 percent; explaining
the Republican’s poor performance. Considering
the Republicans’ strength with white voters in Texas , the Democrats certainly have their
work cut out for them if they want to win the second most populous state in the
union. Conning Congressional Republicans
into passing a DACA amnesty will make that task a lot easier.
After the 2010 elections, California initiated a top-two primary
system, where all candidates run together on the same ballot in the primary
election, regardless of party. The top
two candidates with the highest number of votes then face each other in the
general election, which effectively serves a runoff. In 2016, voters in California had a choice between two
Democrats as they picked their next Senator.
In addition, voters in seven overwhelmingly Democratic Congressional
Districts had a choice between two Democrats for their representative in
Congress. It looks like the same thing
may happen in both statewide races in California
this year. In the Senate, octogenarian
Senator Dianne Feinstein may end up losing her seat this year; but not to a
Republican. Liberal Democrats have
recruited State Senate President Pro Tempore Kevin Deleon to run against
her. The general election match-up could
very well feature a Feinstein-Deleon contest, with no Republican. A similar situation played out last year in California ’s 17th
Congressional District, where Democrat Ro Khanna defeated longtime incumbent
Mike Honda, also a Democrat.
The open gubernatorial race will almost certainly
feature Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who served as Mayor of San Francisco from 2004
until assuming the Lieutenant Governorship in 2011. During his tenure as mayor, Newsom briefly turned
San Francisco ,
arguably the most socially liberal city in the country, into a sanctuary city
for gay marriage at a time when no jurisdiction had voted to legalize it. Polling indicates that he may face Former Los
Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa in November.
No wonder the Democrats have a lead in the generic ballot; if many races
in the country’s largest state will not even have a Republican candidate, that
will certainly contribute to a Democratic lead in the popular vote nationwide. Even if the Democrats win the popular vote in
this year’s midterms, that does not necessarily mean they will walk away with a
majority of seats. California will hold its primary on June 5. After the results of the primary get tallied, we
will have a much better idea of whether or not the California Republican Party
has gone permanently extinct at the state level.
The explosion of the foreign-born population in California has given the Democrats an enormous electoral
advantage in the Golden
State . This
study from the Center for Immigration Studies shows that 55 percent of
immigrant citizens identify with the Democratic Party while just 31 percent
identify as Republicans. Immigrant non-citizens favor the Democratic Party by a
nearly 5-1 margin while Latinos as a whole favor the Democrats by a 2-1
margin. Given this data, the 2016
Presidential Election results in California
should not have come as that much of a surprise. Despite coming out on top in the 2016
Presidential Election, President Trump did not even capture one-third of the
vote in the nation’s most populous state, which gave Hillary Clinton her third
best showing nationwide. California alone caused
Hillary Clinton to win the popular vote.
Of the 53 congressional districts in the state, President Trump only won
seven. Even the “Six
Californias” proposal would not have yielded Republicans much electoral
success. President Trump would have only
won two of the six proposed states; both of them by very narrow margins.
California’s high-tax policies as well as its
promotion of homelessness make it a very unattractive state for people who do
not fall into the category of the “very rich” (who can afford the taxes)
or the “very poor” (who get government handouts) that Mitt Romney talked
about in his Presidential campaign.
Thus, California
has seen a mass exodus among its middle class.
Shankar Singam, an advocate for “Calexit” actually bragged about the
middle class leaving the state, telling
Tucker Carlson that their absence will make room for the “new wave of
immigrants.” He also bragged that “when
our middle class does move out to Texas and Colorado they are taking their values out to the United States . If you look at Texas , in fact, all the major cities
Californians are going to they are turning blue. And soon enough Texas will be a blue state.” The thought of that should scare everybody.
On her TV show last night, Laura Ingraham posed a
question, “Was it smart to explode our foreign population, not through a smart
merit-based immigration system, but through the ludicrous policy of chain
migration?” While many Americans would
respond to Ingraham’s question with an unequivocal “no”, the Democrats would
respond to her question by saying “absolutely.”
Thanks to the explosion of the foreign-born population in California,
the Democrats control every statewide elected office, 27 of 40 seats in the
State Senate, 53 of 80 seats in the State assembly, and 39 of the 53 seats in
the U.S. House of Representatives. The
Democrats hope they can replicate their success nationwide by making the rest
of the country’s demographics more like California . The United States Census predicts
that the Democrats’ dreams may become a reality by the year 2050.
As Ronald Reagan, who could never get elected Governor
of California
today, once said, “If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape
to. This is the last stand on
earth.” Giving the Democrats a permanent
electoral majority nationwide would ensure a loss of freedom as they will work
to expand the power of the state as soon as they take power. California
serves as an important warning sign to the American people what will happen
under a nationwide Democratic supermajority. Those looking for other warning
signs might want to take a look at the big
cities, many of which have not had Republican mayors in decades. Congressional Republicans, if you want the
rest of the country to absorb all of the worst characteristics of California and many of
the nation’s largest cities, then by all means vote to give blanket amnesty to
all 800,000 of the DACA kids with nothing in return. If you want America to remain a free and
prosperous country that many across the world dream of moving to, think twice before
swallowing the Democrats’ poison pill.
Comments
Post a Comment